Search for: "Miner v. Miner" Results 1 - 20 of 2,298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2023, 10:35 am by Aimee Hess
The Texas Supreme Court interpreted yet another confused mineral reservation in a deed in the case of Van Dyke v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:20 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
With less than two months before the May 31 deadline for public companies to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the inclusion of conflict minerals in their products, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a final judgment in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:33 pm
  And one owner of the land has the right to use the surface of the property and owns one-third of the rights to the "minerals" on the land, whereas another owner owns the right to two-thirds of the "minerals" on the land.So are the fossils "minerals" or not? [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:01 am by Charles Sartain
In Smart v. 3039 RNC Holdings LLC, the court reminds us that it will harmonize all parts of a contract, even one that “is not a model of clarity”, to reach the correct result. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:54 am
Last week the San Antonio Court of Appeals decided Lightning Oil Company v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:56 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
Yesterday, in discussing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s grant of review in Butler v. [read post]