Search for: "Mining Company v. Consolidated Mining Company" Results 1 - 20 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2008, 12:40 pm
One case is LEVISA COAL COMPANY v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 8:55 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Feb. 9, 2015), the EEOC brought a religious discrimination suit on behalf of an employee against his coal mining employer defendants, parent company Consol Energy, Inc. and subsidiary Consolidation Coal Company. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The below article of mine originally appeared in the June 29, 2010 edition of the Pennsylvania Law Weekly, a statewide legal news publication. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The following article of mine appeared last week in the January 25, 2011 edition of The Pennsylvania Law Weekly. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 5:09 am
Some defendants are objecting to being lumped in a case with an insurance company defendant. [read post]
Background Residents of the Zambian city of Chingola brought proceedings in the English courts against Vedanta Resources Plc (Vedanta), a UK incorporated parent company, and Konkola Copper Mines Plc (KCM), its Zambian subsidiary, claiming that waste discharged from the Nchanga copper mine – owned and operated by KCM – had polluted the local waterways, causing personal injury to the local residents, as well as damage to property and loss of income. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company (07-308) on whether a company that failed to meet the Tucker Act statute of limitations may seek a tax refund (with interest) directly under the Export Clause, and in Riley v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Stephen Page
  Clients of mine have been surprised at times that although it would appear they own most of the shares, the constitution of the company means that the company is in effect controlled by their former partner. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:37 am by WIMS
<> EPA Requires Mining Company to Restore Damaged Streams in Kentucky - U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 3:36 am
Facts/Discussion: The Appellants' predecessors in interest conveyed 120 acres in Campbell County to Appellee Consolidation Coal Company (Consol). [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:21 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
The judge carried out an analysis of the above authorities, and also the Court of Appeal’s decision in The Quartz Hill Consolidated Gold Mining Company v Eyre (1883) 11 QBD 674 CA. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:01 am by John Jascob
Republicans offered amendments to all three bills that would have provided that a public company need not make a disclosure unless the thing to be disclosed met the materiality standard expressed by the Supreme Court in TSC Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 10:32 am
The Ontario Court of Appeal says the province can “take up” land for mining and forestry without conducting separate consultation with the federal government.On March 18, in Keewatin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Four attorneys will divide the time in three consolidated cases; the lead case is Michigan v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Benguet Consolidated Mining Co., 342 U.S. 437 (1952), in which the Supreme Court upheld that a Philippines-based corporation, Benguet, was amenable to general jurisdiction in Ohio because, due to the exigencies of World War II, the company was forced to temporarily remove its president out of the Philippines to Ohio where he kept an office, maintained the company’s files, and oversaw the company’s activities. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:43 am by Katherine E. Vogelhuber
Benguet Consolidated Mining Co., 342 U.S. 437 (1952), in which the defendant, a Philippines company, was forced to relocate from the Philippines to Ohio during World War II. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:43 am by Katherine E. Vogelhuber
Benguet Consolidated Mining Co., 342 U.S. 437 (1952), in which the defendant, a Philippines company, was forced to relocate from the Philippines to Ohio during World War II. [read post]