Search for: "Minnesota v. Wisconsin"
Results 121 - 140
of 449
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
New York is followed by California (44.6 percent of consumption smuggled), Washington (42.8 percent), New Mexico (40.8 percent), and Minnesota (34.6 percent). [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am
In light of states’ differing responses to the Wayfair v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 6:51 am
A.B., 31 Misc.3d 608, 916 N.Y.S.2d 920 (Sup.Ct.2011) (determining that the home state of a child born in Minnesota after the mother decided not to return to New York after a visit to her childhood home in Minnesota was Minnesota and not New York, where the mother and father had resided as a married couple); Waltenburg v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Frese v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
You yourself suggest that we might demand more of an explanation from Virginia, than say, Wisconsin. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:44 am
Supreme Court’s 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:18 am
Two decades before Smith, Wisconsin v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu) Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu) Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto (jacq.briggs@utoronto.ca)John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jowertheimer@davidson.eduLaw and Empire in the Sino-Asian Context (Harvard Law School / TBD)12:00 PM – 4:30 PMLegal History and the Persistent Power of State and Local Governments (Cambridge Room)Moderators: Brooke… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
For instance, Maryland permits local governments to provide a credit for expanding manufacturing facilities.[6] Similarly, Idaho allows counties to exempt TPP that is part of an investment of at least $500,000 in a new manufacturing plant for up to five years.[7] Seven states (Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania) exempt all TPP from taxation, while another five states (Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, and South Dakota)… [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 7:37 pm
Blood Draw In Birchfield v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:36 am
The Wisconsin Supreme Court in Kriefall v Excel called it as it saw it: The E. coli strain that killed Brianna and made the others sick is a “deleterious substance which may render [meat] injurious to health. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
& Pol’y 303, 313 (2009) (finding, on average, four criminal libel prosecutions per year in Wisconsin from 2000 to 2007); Eugene Volokh, Criminal Libel: Survival and Revival (in draft) (discussing prosecutions in othe [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
LEXIS 38128 (ED WI, March 11, 2019), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint about the one-time enforcement of a rule prohibiting praying on the floor between bunks when the dayroom is closed.In Wilcox v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 7:13 am
LEXIS 33830 (ED WI, March 4, 2019), a Wisconsin federal district court allowed a Jewish inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was removed from the kosher meal program.In Heid v. [read post]
