Search for: "Minnesota v. Wisconsin" Results 141 - 160 of 449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:59 am by Kate Fort
  Finally the following states had 1 appellate ICWA case: Connecticut, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Wisconsin, North Dakota. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:59 am by ilpc
  Finally the following states had 1 appellate ICWA case: Connecticut, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Wisconsin, North Dakota. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
Similar contract requirements are on the books in Georgia, Arkansas, Minnesota, Texas, Ohio, Alabama, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, South Carolina, Rhode Island, Florida, Maryland, and Wisconsin. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
Bernstein, Notre Dame Journal on Legislation] Study finds that after Minnesota jacked up minimum wage, youth employment and restaurant employment fell, restaurant prices rose [Noah Williams, Center for Research on the Wisconsin Economy] In a sleeper SCOTUS case this term, Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
Mountaire delivered more than 100,000 pounds of chicken to AdvancePierre that were later linked to a salmonella outbreak in Wisconsin and Minnesota. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Complete Auto Remains the Rule, As Modified by Wayfair The South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
For example, Louisiana taxes bottled water, but not soda or candy, at the state’s 5 percent general sales tax rate.[8] Meanwhile, Wisconsin levies sales taxes on yogurt covered raisins but not ice cream or popsicles.[9] When political considerations are used to determine sales tax applicability, tax codes become increasingly convoluted and less effective at generating revenue. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm by MBettman
  Three states have dealt with this issue already:  Missouri sided with the Kansas City Royals, but in Missouri the tickets were taxable, 32 S.W.3d 560 (Mo. 2000); Wisconsin sided with the state against the Milwaukee Brewers, arguably based on a narrow statutory exception that does not exist in Ohio, 111 Wis.2d 383 (1983); Minnesota also sided with the state against the Minnesota Twins on the grounds they were a “free token of goodwill,” 587 N.W.2d… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Alan Morrison observes that in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]