Search for: "Minor v. Minor" Results 1 - 20 of 20,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2016, 8:45 am by D Daniel Sokol
Balazs Csepai, Oppenheim discusses Toshiba v Commission: Parental Liability of a Minority Shareholder. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 10:58 pm
Ray Beckerman, attorney for defendant in UMG v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:23 pm
Jessica Slavin, at the Marquette Faculty Blog, writes about a challenge in such a case in Wisconsin:One of the criminal cases, State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm by Collins & Collins, P.C.
The New Mexico Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Diamond v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:27 pm by Dana
Section 17701.02(v) states that “person” includes, among others, “an individual”. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:37 pm
Section 153 (1) of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act says:153 (1)Subject to subsections (2) and (3), if(a)a minor is a beneficiary or an intestate successor, and(b)there is no trustee or no trust created for the minor's interest in the estate,the personal representative, on distribution of the estate, must pay or transfer the minor's interest in the estate to the Public Guardian and Trustee in trust for the minor.In a recent decision, British Columbia… [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:06 am by Venkat Balasubramani
(Previous post: Minors’ Suit Over Facebook Credits Survives in Part – I.B. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:04 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — “Suspected marijuana” Kevin Minor, appellant, was charged in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, with, inter alia, multiple weapons offenses, including wearing, carrying, and transporting a handgun (Count 4); possession of a regulated firearm after having been convicted of a crime of violence (Count 5); possession of ... [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:25 am by Venkat Balasubramani
” “Clickthrough Agreement Binding Against Minors–A.V. v. iParadigms” The post Amazon Can’t Force Arbitration of Minors’ Privacy Lawsuit Over Alexa Recordings–BF v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 5:15 am
In this Telegraph piece, I have argued that given the innovations under Article 15 in Naz Foundation, all vulnerable groups now have unprecedented protection under law, and therefore all minorities, including religious minorities, should welcome it. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am by Susan Brenner
In his appeal, Bowersox claimed his conviction was “unconstitutional . . . because the minors depicted in the material at issue were not actual minors”, citing Ashcroft v. [read post]