Search for: "Minor v. Municipal Court (1990)" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2018, 11:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court has ruled that the all municipalities may be sued under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, even if they employ fewer than 20 people, the numerical threshold for private employers.The case is Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
A municipality sought a similar tort-based tax in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:32 pm by Russell Knight
Greenberg, 550 NE 2d 12 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 1990 “The [Illinois curfew] statute proceeds upon the basic assumption that when a child is at home during the late night and early morning hours, [the child] is protected from physical as well as moral dangers” People v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am by Scott Bomboy
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and parts of McConnell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
Shawn Witte, a Minor, by his next friend and Parent, Teresa Witte, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Teresa Witte, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Detroit is a city known for its history of racial segregation, industrialization and de-industrialization, and the school desegregation battle that led to the Supreme Court striking down a multi-district school desegregation plan in Milliken v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:02 am
Further, a minor cut that was a centimeter long and scratches have been found not to constitute physical injury. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
L.J. 845 , 855 & n.37 (1990)(“Justifying Secrecy”); see generally, CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT, ET. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:54 am
(Updated twice) Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will decide DC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:19 am by MBettman
  Instead, on June 29, 2015, Embassy sued Cora under Ohio’s necessaries statute in Franklin Municipal Court in Warren County, seeking payment from her for Robert’s unpaid expenses. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am by Hans von Spakovsky
  The Court left that question unanswered in 2009, when it decided Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
Smith (1990) (rejecting strict scrutiny of neutral laws that burden religion), but the increased litigation pressure and focus of anti-gay activists may lead courts–especially elected state court judges–in many places to break the dam. [read post]
And because those persons are permitted to vote absentee, so should all persons who claim it would facilitate their religious activities on Election Day to be able to vote by mail.Further, it would seem that exemptions under the Court’s emerging MFN framework would be mandated in more circumstances than case law required prior to 1990’s seminal ruling in Oregon Employment Division v. [read post]