Search for: "Minor v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 16,309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 6:52 am
Plaintiff yelled at the federal judge during sentencing following his conviction for sexual activity with a minor. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:25 am
” Mizrahi v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm
At a juncture when both democratic and authoritarian regimes across the world are vested to persecuting their host Muslim populations, The New Crusades interrogates–through trenchant analysis and direct testimony of Muslims on the ground–how Islamophobia stands as a unifying global thread of both state and societal bigotry. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:39 am
First, does United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
During the session, I joked that Trump v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In a recent decision, Chambers v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
” (p 91) She also cites statistics showing that “public schools in many states are as segregated today as they were in 1954. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:05 am
” Yet, the report only recommends that the Israeli government comply “fully and immediately” with the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) orders in the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:56 am
Gavia v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm
In Lomanto v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
In 1986, in Bowers v. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court case Mississippi Univ. for Women v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
In Dept of State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:57 am
The Judge re-stated the need to make allowance for editorial judgment, citing the principles summarised in Banks-v-Cadwalladr [2022] 1 WLR 5236. [read post]
