Search for: "Minor v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 16,157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Felten underlined the difference between other states’ laws (in that case Texas), and Illinois concerning blue-penciling, stating that Illinois is not in favor of the practice and only allows courts to enforce restrictive covenants by modifying them, if doing so only involves minor changes. 2017 WL 11500971, at *4 (N.D. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
If state authorities had not considered it worthwhile to detain the falsely accused adjustment applicant or teenage shoplifter while sorting out a minor criminal charge, section 3(3) of the Laken Riley Act would mandate that DHS “effectively and expeditiously take custody of the alien. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:09 am by Mark Ashton
Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
Folks who’ve been following this blog for years know that periodically I like to venture beyond New York’s borders to find and report on interesting decisions from other states in business divorce cases. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Affirmative action had been used by many states happily for half-a-century (no one forced them to use it) but a minority of states outlawed affirmative action. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
” [17] Russian Law against “Gay Propaganda” among minors At the end of 2011, the State Duma (the lower house of the Federal Assembly of Russia) started discussing the need to create a new federal law regarding “Gay Propaganda” among minors as it could cause harm to their health and development. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:00 am
Zero Tolerance for Minors in Texas Because of the state's zero-tolerance approach, the DUI charge for minor drivers does not require any impairment, intoxication, or BAC. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]