Search for: "Minor v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 14,835
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2025, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals Judge John Howard's concurrence las month in Ross v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 5:41 am by Eugene Volokh
A short excerpt from Friday's 22,000-word North Carolina Supreme Court opinion in Happel v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 4:24 am by Peter A. Mahler
While LLC Law Section 201 (“Purpose”) states that an LLC “may be formed under this chapter for any lawful business purpose,” nowhere in the statute is there a default rule for an LLC’s “stated purpose. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 3:23 am by INFORRM
In its judgment, SIAC confirmed that the Secretary of State was justified in determining Yang posed a national security risk. [read post]
22 Mar 2025, 11:28 am
And at the center of these human drama, again in the United States, lie the courts and the actors around whom the virtual perfection of law can be incarnated and applied to the affairs of human individuals and their power/rights/duty arrangements. [read post]
22 Mar 2025, 8:36 am
 Owners sued for wrongful termination over a minor breach always argue how important that minor breach was to them. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 1:04 pm by Chris Williams
The obvious one is Bruen, and the second case is Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:24 pm by Stephen Halbrook
"  But even then, the court concedes that the state laws of that period (for the states that had any such laws) only regulated sale of concealable weapons, not rifles or shotguns. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 11:00 am by Donnelly L. McDowell
The Supreme Court, however, has been chipping away at the scope of that holding – finding, for example, in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 5:01 am by Beatrice Yahia
Frank Thorp V, Sahil Kapur, and Ryan Nobles report for NBC News. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Here is Professor Solum, the originator of the Fixation Thesis, talking about gender equality under the 14th Amendment:[I]n Bradwell v. [read post]