Search for: "Minor v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 14,763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2019, 1:21 pm by Daily Record Staff
Following a jury trial, he was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor, second degree sexual offense, ... [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 7:22 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Sex abuse of a minor Appellant, Clarence William Cropper, was charged by criminal indictment in the Circuit Court for Worcester County and subsequently convicted of sex abuse of a minor, sex offense in the second, third and fourth degrees and assault in the second degree in the ... [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:33 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Sexual abuse of minor Jay Andra Colmes, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County of sexual abuse of a minor and two counts of third degree sexual offense. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 9:29 pm
Supplemental claims for a Fourth Amendment violation were properly cognizable in state court under Younger v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:26 am by immigrationprof
United States has to say about the Obama administration's deferred action policy for undocumented immigrants brough to this country as minors. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:37 am by Daily Record Staff
F. have a minor daughter, M., who was also in the ... [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:58 am by Paul Venard
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments about whether sentencing minors to lifetime imprisonment without the possibility of parole violates the 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Dickerson’s opinion also drew support from a 2004 ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Court in Anastos v Sable in which that court upheld application of a minority discount to the valuation of the partnership interest of a partner who wrongfully dissolved the partnership under that state’s statute equivalent to New York Partnership Law § 69. [read post]