Search for: "Mirriam Seddiq"
Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2010, 10:16 am by jamison
I wrote about her the same day in a post called “On Mirriam Seddiq and the Not Guilty No Way Blog.” [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:02 pm by jamison
Regular readers of this blog know that I am a big fan of Mirriam Seddiq.   [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 2:09 am by jamison
I first met Mirriam Seddiq at the monthly get-together of Solosez lawyers in the D.C. area.  [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:39 pm by JD Hull
Last week I was honored to be the first guest of immigration and criminal defense lawyer Mirriam Seddiq on her Not Guilty, Now Way podcast show at its studios in Upper Marlboro, Alabama. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:57 pm by JD Hull
Author, original thinker, lawyer and commentator Mike Cernovich, an American authentic who comes with brains and balls, was interviewed by Mirriam Seddiq last week on her Not Guilty No Way radio podcast show. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:25 am by Jamison Koehler
Also representing Max Kennerly and Mirriam Seddiq in the same suit, David Brickman filed similar motions to dismiss for each of them.   [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 6:42 pm by Eric Turkewitz
These new motions come on behalf of Washington D.C. criminal defense lawyers Mirriam Seddiq (who blogs at Not Guilty) (See: Seddiq Motion)  and Jamison Koehler (See: Koehler Motion) Both are represented by Albany attorney David Brickman, who filed this motion to dismiss on behalf of Philadelphia personal injury attorney Max Kennerly and the Beasly Firm the other day. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:51 am by jamison
A couple of days ago, my friend and colleague Mirriam Seddiq posted a very flattering piece on me on the Not Guilty blog.  [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 3:48 am by jamison
Over at the ABA listserv Solosez, Mirriam Seddiq says that, however much she may write about legal and other issues, her blog entries are really and always just about her. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:00 am by Tom Mighell
Mirriam Seddiq believes that “we are all not guilty of something….”   [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
On similar themes: Mirriam Seddiq, Not Guilty No Way, and Jonathan Adler/Volokh in 2014. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 3:11 pm by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterBlawg Review #279 is up at Mirriam Seddiq’s Not Guilty blog. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm by Jeff Gamso
"We are all," Mirriam Seddiq says in the tag line to her blog, "not guilty of something." [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:18 am by Mike
When Mirriam Seddiq's blog won top Criminal Defense Blog, did women line up to congratulate her?  [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 6:52 am by jamison
Mirriam Seddiq posted a humorous piece yesterday in which she bemoaned the lack of female criminal defense attorneys in the D.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Jeff Gamso
Mirriam Seddiq, at Not Guilty (a terrific blog I'll be adding to the list as soon as I update and which has the wonderful tag line "We are all not guilty of something. . .") has a great post about criminal defense lawyers being grizzlies whatever they look like on the surface.Look at me, I'm so cute. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 2:14 pm by Kathryn Rubino
[Wonkblog] * David Lat chats with Mirriam Seddiq, host of the "Not Guilty No Way" podcast, about legal blogging, perceptions of women lawyers, and his former boss, Chris Christie. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 11:02 pm by Jeff Gamso
This round began, I guess, with Mirriam Seddiq who took a suggestion from law student Laura McWilliams and wrote about The Law, a Love Affair of Sorts.  [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 8:25 am by Editor
Mirriam Seddiq at Not Guilty hosts Blawg Review #279 marking the International Day of the Disappeared. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:12 am by Ken Lammers
I was looking around the internet when I ran across a post by Mirriam Seddiq decrying the Virginia Supreme Court's decision to not allow the common law writ of coram vobis (also known as coram nobis) to be used to change sentences so that two defendants, who pled guilty to charges which could result in their deportation, would not be deported. [read post]