Search for: "Mishkin v. New York"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
On top of existentially threatening the very concept of artists and creatives, AI-generated content raises several new legal issues.[15] Copyrights are a form of intellectual property protected by federal law.[16] Owning a copyright gives the owner the exclusive right to reproduce, publish, or sell an original work of authorship, such as a book, a painting, or a song.[17] Under current copyright law, artists using traditional mediums, such as paint, pen, or paper, are considered the… [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
On top of existentially threatening the very concept of artists and creatives, AI-generated content raises several new legal issues.[15] Copyrights are a form of intellectual property protected by federal law.[16] Owning a copyright gives the owner the exclusive right to reproduce, publish, or sell an original work of authorship, such as a book, a painting, or a song.[17] Under current copyright law, artists using traditional mediums, such as paint, pen, or paper, are considered the… [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
Mishkin On Friday, PHH filed its opening en banc brief with the D.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
Schneiderman, a First Amendment challenge to a New York law that allows merchants to give discounts to customers who pay in cash, but criminalizes the imposition of surcharges for customers who use credit cards, arguing that “the Framers sought to protect speech from the type of cronyism and rent-seeking the New York’s no-surcharge law manifests. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 1:31 pm
Mishkin A recent decision by the U. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:30 pm
CFPB’s Ombudsman’s Office issues fourth annual report – Philadelphia lawyer Barbara Mishkin of Ballard Spahr on the firm’s CFPB Monitor Race in admissions: Opening bell for round 2 of Fisher v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Black students at the University of Missouri interviewed for a story last week in The New York Times made much the same point. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:52 am
A panel decision of the Federal Circuit held, as part of a decision finding lack of standing, the the transfer of patent ownership is a matter of federal law (as developed by Federal Circuit precedent), not New York Law (which the parties to the transfer had agreed should cover the transaction). [read post]
