Search for: "Mississippi Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine after Holyfield     In the time since Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14]  Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception.  [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:07 pm by Tana Fye
In at least one United States Supreme Court case, Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (207US564) — Recognizing tribal water rights by treaty v. (27) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States defeats (27) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:12 am by Kathryn Fort
The Act, passed by Congress in 1978 and interpreted by the Supreme Court once in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield     Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:00 am by Kate Fort
Having disparate interpretations of ICWA was certainly not the intent of Congress in passing a federal law, and conflicts with the rationale of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm by Matthew Parham
As the Supreme Court  explained in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:15 am by Kate Fort
Having disparate interpretations of ICWA was certainly not the intent of Congress in passing a federal law, and conflicts with the rationale of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]