Search for: "Mississippi Power & Light Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
In a concurring opinion in Mississippi Power & Light Company v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
(By Supreme Court rule, any party other than the petitioner is deemed a respondent before the Court, so IMLA et al. are technically respondents supporting petitioners.) [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
FERC; Upper Peninsula Power Co., et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Federal Communications Commission, 17-498 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SUL Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
