Search for: "Missouri v. Iowa" Results 161 - 180 of 376
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2016, 2:13 pm
That is, the government's accommodation would work in most states but not in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, and North and South Dakota — the 8th Circuit. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That would leave the rather bizarre effect that the mandate was in effect in much of the nation, but not in the seven states that are located in the Eighth Circuit: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, and North and South Dakota. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Theoretically, this essay argues that these contexts are useful, if not essential, to understanding most high-profile, high-significance lawsuits, like Dred Scott v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:30 am
VanderVelde, University of Iowa College of Law, has published The Dred Scott Case in Context at 40 Journal of Supreme Court History 263 (2015). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:12 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The legislative history of Public Act 97-1161 suggests that the bill was intended to encourage that FBO to expand in Illinois instead of Nebraska, Missouri or Iowa – states where the plaintiff pays no property taxes. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The vote was a rare setback for LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender) activists who had enjoyed recent success in both the legal and public opinion arenas, culminating in the June 28, 2015 Supreme Court opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  The Northern District of Iowa’s courthouse in Cedar Rapids has a history center with interactive exhibits on federal judicial history from the statehood of Iowa to today. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:10 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Cosigners of the letter include senators Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Ron Wyden of Oregon, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Mark Kirk of Illinois, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Claire McCaskill of Missouri. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
July 31, 2009) (hospital sued as distributor of medical device entitled to dismissal under Missouri statute); Spears v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]