Search for: "Missouri v. Kansas"
Results 181 - 200
of 683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
In Missouri and Kansas, the question is less straightforward. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 1:05 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:30 am
[Kansas City, Missouri, ca. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
NFIB v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:01 am
Fourth Circuit rejects gag order on parties and potential witnesses in North Carolina hog farm litigation [Eugene Volokh] Eighth Circuit, interpreting Missouri law’s obligation to register as “lobbyist,” leaves open possibility that requirement extends to unpaid lobbyists, also known as concerned citizens [Jason Hancock, Kansas City Star; Institute for Free Speech on Calzone v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 1:22 pm
Kansas Department of Corrections, 2018 U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am
The Task Force has already seen results, facilitating voluntary local reforms, and it takes on even greater importance in the wake of the Wayfair v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 10:15 am
., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340, and Gee v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:25 am
Attorneys for Planned Parenthood had argued that Missouri’s laws were “virtually identical” [Kansas City Star report] to the Texas law declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2016 in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 7:15 am
LEXIS 147006 (D KA, Aug. 29, 2018), a Kansas federal district court gave an inmate 30 days to show why his sketchy complaint regarding a religious diet should not be dismissed.In Masek v. [read post]
