Search for: "Missouri v. Kansas" Results 181 - 200 of 642
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2019, 9:41 pm by Sam Brunson
What happened is this: on April 26, 2018, the Attorney General of Michigan signed onto an amicus brief with the states of Wisconsin, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:27 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 5425 (D KA, Jan. 11, 2019), a Kansas federal district court gave an inmate 3 weeks to show cause not to dismiss his complaint that he was without his Bible for 3 days after a search.In Dayton v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Fourth Circuit rejects gag order on parties and potential witnesses in North Carolina hog farm litigation [Eugene Volokh] Eighth Circuit, interpreting Missouri law’s obligation to register as “lobbyist,” leaves open possibility that requirement extends to unpaid lobbyists, also known as concerned citizens [Jason Hancock, Kansas City Star; Institute for Free Speech on Calzone v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]