Search for: "Missouri v. Kansas Gas Co" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2013, 6:51 am by Bill Marler
Thirty-three outbreak-associated deaths were reported: Colorado (9), Indiana (1), Kansas (3), Louisiana (2), Maryland (1), Missouri (3), Montana (1), Nebraska (1), New Mexico (5), New York (2), Oklahoma (1), Texas (2), and Wyoming (2). [read post]
For example, the Task Force may investigate a company that markets itself as “sustainable,” claims its products are “biodegradable,” or says it is divesting from oil and gas, to ensure those disclosures or claims are in fact truthful. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
 Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
– EPA News Release, August 10, 2010 Tanco Kansas City, LLP, a bulk materials storage facility, has agreed to pay a $97,845 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated federal laws by failing to properly document its storage of sulfuric acid and prepare a Facility Response Plan (FRP) to guard against spills of its materials into a tributary of the Missouri River. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
– EPA News Release, May 6, 2010 A metal engraving and electroplating company in North Kansas City, Mo., has agreed to pay a $31,612 civil penalty to settle allegations that it failed to file annual reports with EPA and the State of Missouri disclosing the types of toxic chemicals that were manufactured, processed or otherwise used at its facility. [read post]