Search for: "Mitchell v. Brooks" Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 11:40 pm by Sme
Commissioner (10th Cir., July 17, 2015) (affirming the Commission determination that Brooks had received an overpayment of Disability benefits)Santos v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 10:21 am
Grenier    Northern District of Ohio at AkronCRIMINAL CASE 08a0038p.06 Brooks v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm by Cal Law
" But in Friday's case, Brooks v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The defence case in the phone hacking trial begins at the Old Bailey on Wednesday 19 February 2014 with the case of Rebekah Brooks. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Also, over on LXBN TV, Claire Mitchell joins me to discuss the FDA potentially moving to ban trans fats. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On Monday 24 March 2014 Tugendhat J heard applications for third party disclosure in the linked “Plebgate” cases of Mitchell v News Group and Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Kevin LaCroix] “Insider Trading: The Unknowable Crime” [Thaya Brook Knight and Ilya Shapiro on Cato amicus brief in Salman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am by chief
Those proceedings were concerned with the duties of a coroner, particularly where the death had occurred before the Human Rights Act 1998 had come into force.Ms Hurst had also commenced civil proceedings against the police and the local authority, but these were discontinued on the advice of her legal representatives based on Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire in the Court of Appeal – probably… [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am by chief
Those proceedings were concerned with the duties of a coroner, particularly where the death had occurred before the Human Rights Act 1998 had come into force.Ms Hurst had also commenced civil proceedings against the police and the local authority, but these were discontinued on the advice of her legal representatives based on Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire in the Court of Appeal – probably… [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As a preliminary matter, the motion court properly considered plaintiffs’ theory of lost-time damages because, although the theory was not pleaded in the complaint, it was the subject of discovery, and defendant cannot reasonably claim that it did not have notice of or was surprised by it (see Mitchell v 423 W. 55th St., 187 AD3d 661, 662 [1st Dept 2020]; Penner v Hoffberg Oberfest Burger & Berger, 44 AD3d 554, 555 [1st Dept 2007]). [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:14 pm by Stephen M. Ozcomert
According to facts revealed in the District Court, Brooks Lamar Mitchell was an employee of McLendon when he was driving a truck with two passengers and collided with a County bus. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:14 pm by Stephen M. Ozcomert
According to facts revealed in the District Court, Brooks Lamar Mitchell was an employee of McLendon when he was driving a truck with two passengers and collided with a County bus. [read post]