Search for: "Mitchell v. Harmony" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
Mitchell, 11-9843 (the habeas case “essentially the same” as Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:59 pm
  While rock-and-rollers can often flout the rules, it’s always a good idea for lawyers to follow them, as this case demonstrates.In Meeks v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
(For those wanting a fuller reminder of the Dunsmuir analysis, see, for example, a summary by Mitchell Grossell, then a student at Western, here. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
But it does lead to significant "temporal disuniformity", as the rule today is not necessarily the rule tomorrow.In any case, Sharon's basic point is well-taken: even assuming (express or implied) preemption, even assuming exclusive federal jurisdiction, and even assuming a single harmonious circuit court to handle all appeals, federalization does not necessarily mean complete uniformity.(6) Suspect Authority to Make Federal Common Law? [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am by David
v=43f2bBjGi_8 Now, that’s quite a quirky repertory, and it stands in favorable comparison to Tom’s: the periodic table, plagiarism, pollution, the new math, the Vatican II conference, and of course the silent letter ‘e’. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
  On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]