Search for: "Mitchell v. Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2016, 2:59 am by tracey
Supreme Court Johnson, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 56 (19 October 2016) Mitchell, R v (Northern Ireland) [2016] UKSC 55 (19 October 2016) Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor, R (on the application of)v Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 54 (19 October 2016) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) JEB Recoveries LLP v Binstock [2016] EWCA Civ 1008 (19 October 2016) Court of Appeal (Criminal… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
Here’s another volume in Hart’s Landmark Cases series that is now out in paperback: Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract, edited by Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell, both of University College London. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Susan Schneider
In so holding, the court distinguished Wendinger v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm by Michael J. Petro
During trial, Johnson-Taylor and Mitchell both testified that Johnson-Taylor stated that Zuniga possessed a gun. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
plus a double underlying of the symbol for John Mitchell (M)—indicating that this was a matter of great importance to Nixon and it had emphasized that Mitchell was to “keep Anna Chennault working on SVN,” or South Vietnam, and “insist [unclear] on the 3 Johnson conditions,” referring to the information Nixon had learned in his conversation with President Johnson, who wanted North Vietnam to stop shelling the demilitarized zone, to… [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 2:53 am by Michelle Buhalo
Henry Williams, Philadelphia Common Pleas Judges Eugene V. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:33 am
Henry Williams, Philadelphia Common Pleas Judges Eugene V. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:02 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 135297 (D MD, Sept. 29, 2016) a Maryland federal district court rejected a Muslim inmate's complaint that the vegetarian diet that complies with his religious requirements consists of a repetition of the same meals.In Johnson v. [read post]