Search for: "Mitchell v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2016, 7:50 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Those deemed permanently disabled by the Social Security Administration (SSA) are entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits, assuming they worked for a time prior to the onset of their disability. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:15 pm
An exciting program is being planned for this year's conference, and will include subthemes of "Food Sustainability and Security Practices," "Food Safety v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 11:40 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., July 16, 2015) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the Social Security Administration on Bandi's racial and sexual discrimination claims)Mitchell v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:16 am by Kourtni R. Mason
 He alleged that he received $200 to $300 per month from his parents, but acknowledged that he received $1,357.80 per month in Social Security benefits. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 4:14 pm by TEI Expert
Forensic sociologists and criminologists also examine liability issues pertaining to workplace violence and personnel administration. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:36 am by Gregory Dell
At the same time, the plaintiff was determined as being disabled by the Social Security Administration and issued a favorable decision on his claim for disability benefits.  [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J gave directions in the two “Plebgate” libel actions, Mitchell v NGN and Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am by Susan Brenner
Maxwell, an employee of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), assisted [Laiwala] by processing false DMV test scores, and Howard assisted in obtaining false Social Security numbers.People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Instead, securities law serves as a backdrop for debates over statutory interpretation, the use of legislative history, and the relationship of the judiciary to the administrative state. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
Nevertheless, same-sex couples in New York who marry will not be married under federal law -- a confusing situation when it comes to immigration, taxes, and federal benefits such as Social Security. [read post]