Search for: "Moldovan v. State" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am by INFORRM
The Court first reiterated that Article 10 protects ‘expressive conduct’, including expressive conduct which offends, shocks or disturbs the State or ‘any section of the population’. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 12:24 pm by Kevin
Link: The BLT: The Blog of Legal TimesLink: Taitz v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
The issue turned on the legal status of the Moldovan declaration of independence, and its relation to the Moldovan constitution. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:29 am
After some research in the matter, we believe a tie is not a loss, and Memon, survives another week.See, Bushel’s Case (1670) 124 E.R.1006; Bushel's case;  and Entick v Carrington [1765] 19 Howell's State Trials 1030. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:28 am
"Moldovan Police Put End to Fake Newspaper Scam" is the joyous headline of an item in the most recent issue of the Petosevic IP News from Eastern Europe.   [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:01 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Moldovan authorities reportedly shared their investigative files to “spotlight how dangerous the nuclear black market has become. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:02 am
 Cases reported in this issue include the European Court of Human Rights decision in Balan v Moldova, where the uncompensated appropriation of Balan's photo of Soroca Castle for use on official Moldovan identity cards was held to breach Balan's human rights. [read post]