Search for: "Moncrieffe v. Holder" Results 41 - 60 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
The Court granted certiorari yesterday in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 4:21 pm by Jennifer Koh
Holder),  possession of marijuana with intent to distribute (in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 4:50 pm by Steve Kalar
Ct. 2243, 2248 . . . (2016), the more specific question is whether the least serious form of the offense meets the Johnsonstandard, see Moncrieffe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
Wed., Oct. 10: 11-702 — Moncrieffe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:30 pm by Rumpole
 The Supreme Court (Motto: "We're more than health care") granted cert in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm by John Elwood
  It’s possible that the Court is holding the case for Moncrieffe v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
Luke Rioux discusses the decision in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am by Kate Evans
Some state statutes sweep broadly, like the Georgia law at issue in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:41 am by Steve Kalar
Reviewing de novo, we also examine Johnson’s CPC § 245(a)(1) conviction to determine whether it truly was for a felony, and if so, whether, in light of Moncrieffe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:02 pm by Nancy Morawetz
Holder (9-0 decision rejecting government’s argument that two simple drug-possession convictions can be combined and treated as a drug-trafficking aggravated felony); and Moncrieffe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:12 am by Peter Margulies
The Supreme Court has regularly issued decisions that clarify the scope of various aggravated felony provisions in the INA (see Moncrieffe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Courts of Appeals for the 4th and 8th Circuits have held; and (2) whether, when a federal court applies Moncrieffe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Courts of Appeals for the 4th and 8th Circuits have held; and (2) whether, when a federal court applies Moncrieffe v. [read post]