Search for: "Monge v. California" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
Becerra, a First Amendment challenge by crisis-pregnancy centers to a California law that requires disclosures about the availability of publicly funded family-planning services, including contraception and abortion, arguing that “[a]mong its many problems, the lower court’s definition of ‘professional speech’ is dangerously overbroad. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:30 am
These facts support deference to California's stronger interest (see Flintkote Co. v American Mut. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:11 pm by Mike
Several Northern District of California judges have recently released orders in civil rights cases and petitions for habeas corpus, among them: In Bolbol v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:30 am by Katherine Gallo
Supercuts, Inc. (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1519, 1540 (pdf);Monge v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:30 am by Katherine Gallo
Supercuts, Inc. (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1519, 1540 (pdf);Monge v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At his eponymous blog, William Goren looks at Monday’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Becerra, a First Amendment challenge by crisis-pregnancy centers to a California law requiring disclosures about the availability of publicly funded family-planning services; he asserts that “[a]mong its many and obvious flaws, the act accepts as gospel truth the false narrative from NARAL that pregnancy centers mislead women. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Publication of personal pictures, in this instance of a wedding, was sanctioned on copyright grounds by an Appeal Court in Florida (Monge v Maya Magazines (10-56710)). [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At On the Docket, Stephen Saltzburg highlights some of the questions remaining after the court’s decision in Kansas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
May 19, 2003) (applying California law).ConnecticutLevesque v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
  A raft of California intermediate appellate decisions applies the learned intermediary rule to medical devices. [read post]