Search for: "Monk v. Monk"
Results 1 - 20
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 8:24 am
Scott v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
tend not to go far (recall how exciting Klein v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Have no fear, though; previously, in Lake v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 5:42 pm
Supreme Court denied review in Castille v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm
Sims v Dacorum Borough Council [2014] UKSC 63 If there is a positive to take from this, it is that it is a Supreme Court judgment that won't take long to discuss. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:34 am
Knapton v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
R(Husband) v Solihull; Dixon v Wandsworth. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
R(Husband) v Solihull; Dixon v Wandsworth. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:11 am
Blečić v Croatia (2004) 41 EHRR 185; McCann v UK [2008] HLR 40; Cosic v Croatia App. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:25 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:16 pm
An unusual opening to yesterday's Tax Court opinion in Monk v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:31 pm
For crossing an intersection when the "DON'T WALK" sign was flashing.Yet, notwithstanding the incredibly tiny monetary interest at stake, the opinion may well have more practical significance to most of us than nearly every single one of the other appellate opinions we read.Pamela Monk got her $25 ticket because a police officer saw her enter the crosswalk when the red "DON'T WALK" sign was flashing, and was in it's "countdown" mode; e.g.,… [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:01 am
S J & J Monk have been granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 4:04 am
For those of you who have followed Nossaman's blog since the very early days, you'll recall our coverage of a significant regulatory takings case, Monks v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:31 am
The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal, holding that, in accordance with the ‘reality principle’ of Local Government Finance Act 1988, Sch 6 that a property should be valued as it in fact existed on the material day, S J & J Monk were entitled to reduce the liability of the property at issue to local authority rates during reconstruction. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
The Court of Appeal was bound by the House of Lords decision in Hammersmith v Monk. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
The Court of Appeal was bound by the House of Lords decision in Hammersmith v Monk. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
The UK therefore offered £3000 by way of just satisfaction, costs and expenses.Despite Mr Dixon’s argument that had Art 8 been applied to his case in a substantive sense, no possession order would have been made, the Court found the offer of compensation to be in line with its findings in previous cases dealing with Article 8 and proportionality and it declared continuation of the application to be unjustified.To my knowledge, there are no other applications pending in the ECHR on the… [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
The UK therefore offered £3000 by way of just satisfaction, costs and expenses.Despite Mr Dixon’s argument that had Art 8 been applied to his case in a substantive sense, no possession order would have been made, the Court found the offer of compensation to be in line with its findings in previous cases dealing with Article 8 and proportionality and it declared continuation of the application to be unjustified.To my knowledge, there are no other applications pending in the ECHR on the… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:12 pm
In Black v. [read post]
