Search for: "Monroe Freedman"
Results 61 - 80
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2012, 10:17 am
(To name just a few: the recent flap over King & Spalding's withdrawal from representing the House of Representatives in the DOMA litigation (see here for Paul Clement's resultant resignation from the firm); the debate between Monroe Freedman and Michael Tigar over the latter's representation of Nazi John Demjanjuk (outlined in the appendix to Freedman's book, Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics, App. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Freedman Legal Ethics Forum Houston M Johnny Buckles Nonprofit Law Prof Blog Illinois M Robert Lawless Credit Slips Illinois F Christine Hurt Conglomerate Indiana Indianapolis M Gerard Magliocca Concurring Opinions Indiana Indianapolis M David Orentlicher Health Law Prof Blog Indiana Indianapolis, M Nicolas P. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Florida Drug Statute Constitutional - Breaking News Update July 12, 2012 - The Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion today in State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Florida Drug Statute Constitutional - Breaking News Update July 12, 2012 - The Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion today in State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
Freedman, Professional Responsibility of the Criminal Defense Lawyer: The Three Hardest Questions, 64 Mich. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:46 pm
”* Keep in mind that “even grossly incompetent lawyering,” as Monroe Freedman reminds us, “is not enough to establish ineffective counsel,” and that the current criminal justice system—especially for poor people—is, in Freedman’s pithy characterization, “unethical, unconstitutional, and intolerably cruel. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:51 am
" Discussion focuses on the attempt to apply a poker metaphor (tell) to the question: Some highlights of the exchange between Monroe Freedman, Professor of Law at Hofstra Law and John Steele, publisher of the site and legal ethics specialist: Monroe Freedman: "Abbe and I discuss playbook information in connection with COI in ULE at p. 259. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:33 am
George Conk, at Otherwise, alerted us to an editorial (behind a paywall) at NLJ that cites Monre Freedman's blog post. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
Monroe Freedman questions the prosecutor's press conference. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:34 pm
Also, see the comment of Monroe Freedman below. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:43 am
(A plume is a ballpoint pen that says, "Excellent job -- Monroe Freedman" and has the scales of justice on it.) [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
" As I had noted in the previous post by Monroe Freedman, I don't believe that Justice Kagan's email provided grounds for recusal. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:52 am
Reply Monroe Freedman – I don’t see any difference in First Amendment terms between a law professor blogging to influence a pending case, and a N.Y. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:24 pm
Hardwick, a regular consultant and expert witness on legal and judicial ethics in Texas, and Monroe H. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
Susan Fortney asked me to post the following notice, reporting a well deserved honor for our own Monroe Freedman: Congratulations to Professor Monroe Freedman on his most recent well-deserved recognition. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm
For a critique from the perspective of what purports to be a more accurate account of such a “theory,” see the student Note, “This is Real Hip-Hop…,” from the Georgetown Law Journal, 99.4 (2011): 1179-1225.[2] Keeping in mind that even “grossly incompetent lawyering,” as Monroe Freedman says, “is not enough to establish ineffective counsel. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm
.); (15) Monroe H. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:47 am
“The prosecutors are right in raising this issue,” said Monroe Freedman, a law professor at Hofstra University and the author of “Understanding Lawyer Ethics. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:14 am
UPDATE: In the comments, Monroe Freedman points us to this New York Times article, written by Joanna Schwartz of UCLA, about the $500 in settlements and judgments that New York City has had to pay out to settle claims related to police conduct. [read post]
