Search for: "Monroe Freedman"
Results 101 - 120
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2007, 8:00 am
Monroe Freedman, the legal-ethics guru at Hofstra Law, told the Times, “A lawyer is required to put a client’s interest above his or her own, indeed above anyone else’s. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:05 pm
Don’t be surprised if trainers develop into lobby in favor of keeping program going [Maggie Thurber, Ohio Watchdog, thanks for quote] “Law prof’s Garlock testimony details asbestos lawyers’ change in strategy” [Chamber-backed Legal NewsLine on Lester Brickman analysis] Plus, new ATRA website on asbestos litigation abuse; “BakerHostetler 2014 Year-End Review of Class Actions (and what to expect in 2015)” [via Paul Karlsgodt] R.I.P. legal ethicist… [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:17 am
(To name just a few: the recent flap over King & Spalding's withdrawal from representing the House of Representatives in the DOMA litigation (see here for Paul Clement's resultant resignation from the firm); the debate between Monroe Freedman and Michael Tigar over the latter's representation of Nazi John Demjanjuk (outlined in the appendix to Freedman's book, Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics, App. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:27 am
Renowned legal ethics expert Monroe Freedman said, “The opinion therefore confirms that Feinberg has been engaging in unethical conduct that has been misleading claimants and posing a serious threat to the administration of justice. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:10 am
Thus, Professor Monroe Freedman has opined that "Civility [in the context of litigation tactics] is simply a euphemism for the old boy network, for covering up for each other. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:56 am
Davis, professor of law at American University’s Washington College of Law; Monroe Freedman, a professor of law and former dean at the Maurice A. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:03 pm
The easiest solution is the one that Monroe Freedman mentioned in his comment to this post: rule that judicial elections themselves are a violation of due process. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:42 pm
Hofstra law professor Monroe Freedman thinks it should be. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
” As Monroe H. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 8:54 am
You can also find some commentary in favor of screening in David McGowan's post and arguments against it in Monroe Freedman's post. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
I was reminded of all this the other day reading a wonderful book edited by Abbe Smith and Monroe Freedman, "How Can You Represent Those People? [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
I was reminded of all this the other day reading a wonderful book edited by Abbe Smith and Monroe Freedman, "How Can You Represent Those People? [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 6:08 am
Rev. 275 (1986), Monroe H. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:13 am
Moritz College of Law and ethics scholar Monroe Freedman of Hofstra University School of Law said Bright's distinction is an important and valid one. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:47 pm
Babe Howell Karen Pita Loor Karen Sanders Karena Rahall Katherine Goldwasser Kenneth Simons Kent Moston Kerry Hultquist Kevin McElroy Kimberly Bailey LaJuana Davis Larry Allred Laura Appelman Laura Oren Lauren Carasik Lawrence Marshall Linda Keller Lynne Henderson Margaret Fisher Margery Koosed Marianne Artusio Mario Machado Marjorie Cohn Marjorie Silver Martin Garvey Mary Berkheiser Mary Sue Backus Matt Henry Melinda Branscomb Meredith Duncan Michael Benza Michael Lahammer Michael Mannheimer… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:41 pm
It's essentially the argument that was at the center of the famous Freedman-Tigar debate, which Monroe describes in his book with Abbe Smith and which Brad Wendel describes in this excellent article. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:57 am
They've also been discussing the issue over at the WSJ law blog, where they quote defense attorney Benjamin Brafman's rapidly disproved boast that his client Mel Weiss "will be fully exonerated," as well as Monroe Freedman, the Hofstra legal ethicist and regular antipode of views expressed on this site, who says that generally speaking, he doesn't see problems with a lawyer making aggressive statements to the press in defense of his client. [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 2:52 am
I salute Monroe Freedman for this advice. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:19 am
Hofstra University law professor Monroe Freedman, who reviewed a copy of the transcript, said: "I have no sympathy for these lawyers, but there is only one purpose for pretrial detention, and that is to make sure defendants will appear again, not to make an example of them for image purposes. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 7:47 pm
  As the comments after Monroe's post explain, there are some potential problems with the Massachusetts provision, including the level of knowledge that lawyers should have before disclosing, but the benefits of such an exception probably outweigh the costs. [read post]
