Search for: "Monroe Freedman" Results 101 - 120 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2008, 3:35 pm
Posted by Alan Childress Monroe Freedman (Hofstra) has posted to SSRN his article, "Getting Honest About Client Perjury," as published in vol. 21 of Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics (2008). [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 7:47 pm
  As the comments after Monroe's post explain, there are some potential problems with the Massachusetts provision, including the level of knowledge that lawyers should have before disclosing, but the benefits of such an exception probably outweigh the costs. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:08 pm
[Question from Monroe Freedman: I referred to you as a cautionary warning. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 10:08 pm
Hofstra's Monroe Freedman announces the news (cross-posted from Point of Law; earlier coverage). [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 10:07 pm
Hofstra's Monroe Freedman announces the news. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 1:14 pm
Writing at Legal Ethics Forum, Monroe Freedman of Hofstra attempts to fend off criticism of the invitation of disbarred felon and terrorist-enabler Lynne Stewart to address the university's annual legal ethics conference. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:33 am
” The Law Blog heard this morning from Monroe Freedman, Hofstra Law’s legal ethics guru. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:19 am
Hofstra University law professor Monroe Freedman, who reviewed a copy of the transcript, said: "I have no sympathy for these lawyers, but there is only one purpose for pretrial detention, and that is to make sure defendants will appear again, not to make an example of them for image purposes. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:49 am
"The notion that it is wrong to report misconduct may be an appropriate ethic for the schoolyard or the gutter, but it's not worthy of those who claim to be professionals," said Monroe Freedman, a Hofstra law school professor who teaches and writes about legal ethics [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 5:10 am
I sat with Monroe Freedman for a while, inadvertently (ha ha) stealing him from the main conversation. [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:36 am
  So Monroe Freedman, David Hricik, Brad Wendel, and I plan to be at the Aria Bar in the Fairmont Hotel between 6:15 and 7:15 p.m. next Thursday, May 31. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:01 pm
PLEASE SAVE THE DATE LAWYERING AT THE EDGE The 2007 Hofstra Legal Ethics Conference Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday October 14-16, 2007 Roy Simon, Conference Director Confirmed Faculty (to date) Keynote Address: Michael Tigar Raymond Brown James Campbell Angela Davis Eric Freedman Monroe Freedman Leon Friedman Stephen Gillers Glenda Grace Bruce Green Joel Hirschhorn Ronald Kuby Gerald Lefcourt Richard Mauro Kevin McMunigal Daniel Mori Andrew Perlman … [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:16 pm
There are bloggers, and there are scholars who blog, and Brad Wendel demonstrates the latter again over at Legal Ethics Forum, with a post on l'affaire Monica Goodling - US Attorney, followed by comments from Andy Perlman and Monroe Freedman.... [read post]
10 May 2007, 12:29 pm
I am delighted that legal ethics pioneer and legend, Professor Monroe Freedman, has signed up as a co-blogger. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 10:53 am
In conducting some research in Campbell's Lives of the Lord Chancellors of England (1857), Professor Monroe Freedman came across a fascinating exchange involving Lord Erskine's defiance of the court. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 9:19 am
Professor Monroe Freedman has sent in the beginning of a draft of an article that will also be the subject of a panel on the Lake Pleasant Buried Bodies Case at the upcoming PR conference in Chicago. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 12:46 pm
Professor Freedman sent me a note about an article draft that he has posted on SSRN. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:00 am
Monroe Freedman, the legal-ethics guru at Hofstra Law, told the Times, “A lawyer is required to put a client’s interest above his or her own, indeed above anyone else’s. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:23 am
In my contribution to the symposium honoring the work of Monroe Freedman, I argued that there is a cab-rank principle in American law, even if there isn't a bottom-line, enforceable duty to accept representation of any client. [read post]