Search for: "Monroe Freedman"
Results 101 - 120
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2010, 10:20 am
I've got something of a love/hate relationship with Scott Turow. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:34 am
As many of you know, two of our contributors, Monroe Freedman and Steve Lubet, revisited the iconic figure of Atticus Finch. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:24 pm
I promise that I'm not posting this just to get a rise from Monroe Freedman, but rather because I found it interesting. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:43 pm
Steve's position is set out in "Monroe Freedman's Solution to the Criminal Defense Lawyer's Trilemma Is Wrong As a Matter of Policy and Constitutional Law," 34 Hofstra L. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 5:42 am
UPDATE: The comments of Monroe Freedman (Hofstra) are worth... [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:20 am
Monroe Freedman, Andy Perlman, and a slew of others participated at Mercer Law School's symposium on ethical issues in the digital age, and the transcript is available on line, here. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 6:08 am
Rev. 275 (1986), Monroe H. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:03 pm
The easiest solution is the one that Monroe Freedman mentioned in his comment to this post: rule that judicial elections themselves are a violation of due process. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 8:54 am
You can also find some commentary in favor of screening in David McGowan's post and arguments against it in Monroe Freedman's post. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:01 pm
For an argument against screening, see Monroe Freedman's comments here. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:10 am
Thus, Professor Monroe Freedman has opined that "Civility [in the context of litigation tactics] is simply a euphemism for the old boy network, for covering up for each other. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 7:36 pm
(I remember Professor Monroe Freedman on the first day of classes telling us that from the minute we entered the room that we were going to be feared by all the other professions in the world, that as lawyers we were the ones they most worried about. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 11:22 pm
Numerous commentators, including co-blogger Monroe Freedman (update: article download here), have argued that public defenders should refuse to take on new cases if their workloads prevent them from providing competent representation. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:44 am
For further information, contact professor Patrick Longan at (478) 301-2639 or longan_p [at sign] law.mercer.edu The Keynote speech will be by our own Professor Monroe Freedman. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:49 am
He was one of the 36 legal ethicists who signed onto Professor Monroe Freedman's opinion stating that the romantic relationship between the judge and DA in the Charles Hood case created a "structural defect" rendering the conviction and sentence "invalid per se. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:47 pm
Monroe Freedman's comments about that proposal are here. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 5:05 pm
Last week, I posted a link to Professor Fred Zacharias's new article on lawyers who lie to the court, which mentions a well-known example by Monroe Freedman. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
The article addresses a famous hypothetical by Monroe Freedman and is the product of a lecture that Professor Zacharias gave at Case Western University Law School last year. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 10:38 pm
Posted by Alan Childress Updating Nancy Rapoport's post on LPB here (and more at her personal blog), and the vital efforts of Monroe Freedman at LEF here, I just received an email from one of Charles Dean Hood's attorneys (Andrea... [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:44 pm
This is kind of cool: a brief in the new Duke lacrosse lawsuit cites Monroe Freedman's comment to a post on this blog. [read post]
