Search for: "Monroe v. Monroe" Results 401 - 420 of 1,417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2017, 12:50 pm by Jenny Schu
In Michigan Dep't of Agriculture v Appletree Marketing, Inc, the Michigan Supreme Court held that the Agricultural Commodities Marketing Act (ACMA) does not provide the exclusive remedy for its violation and does not supersede preexisting statutory remedies or abrogate common law remedies.The Court concluded that the Court of Appeals erred by relying on Morales v Auto-Owner's Insurance Co. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
  There is one appeal listed for January 2018 30 January 2018, Stocker v Stocker Permission Applications Applications for permission to appeal in the following case are awaiting decisions by the single judge Monroe v Hopkins Guise v Shah Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers Denman v Associated Newspapers There is an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court by some of the defendant which is pending in the case… [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 4:23 am by SHG
Monroe., which is the source of any claim that colleges have a duty under Title IX to be involved in peer-to-peer sexual misconduct at all. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Nor did the fact that the decisionmakers questioned the veracity of his PTSD claim show that the stated reason for discharging him—creating a hostile and intimidating work environment for his subordinates—was pretextual, the Seventh Circuit ruled, affirming summary judgment against his ADA and Rehab Act claims (Monroe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nuvasive, 842 F.3d at 1383(citing Bowman Transp., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 5:19 am by SHG
” The closest the law comes to authorizing a federal agency that they have any business in college students’ pants is Davis v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 12:06 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
Monroe County Board of Education, which deals with sexual harassment in schools, and Stiles v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB) – see our case comment from Nathan Capone. [read post]