Search for: "Montana Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Montana corporations in their challenge treated the two sources of legislative power as indistinguishable, arguing that the Montana decision and Citizens United could not co-exist, so the Montana ruling could not stand.  [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Thus, your lesser (state) power can't force me/my client to do something else or punish me/my client for doing what federal power demands. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The IRC is the tool of the popular legislature, just as commissions are the tools of the elected legislatures in states like Montana, Idaho, New Jersey, Washington, and Hawaii. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The IRC is the tool of the popular legislature, just as commissions are the tools of the elected legislatures in states like Montana, Idaho, New Jersey, Washington, and Hawaii. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:11 am by Bethany Berger
Although Indians are generally subject to all federal taxes, states have no power to tax Indians on reservations unless federal law expressly permits such taxes. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins and David Hudson
He is the co-founder and co-chair of the First Amendment Salons and was formerly the Harold S. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:01 pm
Montana Power Co.[6], the court notes that where there is "zero foreclosure", there is zero tying claim. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
” The justices held 8-1 in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Concord EFS, Inc. 13-63Issue: Whether a plaintiff who purchases directly from a member of a price-fixing conspiracy is necessarily a “direct purchaser” under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
Blawgletter found the issue interesting -- so much so that we co-wrote an amicus brief pro bono for the States of Connecticut, Arizona, Illinois, Montana, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Tennessee. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]