Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
United States and GE Energy Power Conversion France v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:58 am by Sue Meyer
On August 21, 2014, the United States District Court for the District of Montana remanded the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forested State Trust Lands Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and suspended the associated Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit(Permit) for incidental take of the threatened grizzly bear. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Peter Vickery
In fact, corporations are free to make campaign contributions so long as they solicit them from employees and shareholders, then pass them on to candidates via separate, transparent accounts, and file two simple forms with the state.When Montana’s state’s supreme court upheld the law, ATP asked the Supreme Court of the United States to stay the decision, effectively granting an injunction. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:52 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Among other arguments, they urged the Court not to consider developments in campaign finance since the Court’s 2010 ruling that is centrally at issue: Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 8:54 am by Bill Raftery
Constitution provides “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:52 pm by Rick Hasen
”   The Senators’ brief, filed in American Tradition Partnership v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm by Unknown
Cranford (Reserved Water Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPamela J. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm by Unknown
United States (Tribal Courts; Double Jeopardy) Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm by NARF
United States (Trust Relationship; Tucker Act) Alegre v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am by Court C. VanTassell
The Court affirmed that the landowners’ state law claims were not preempted by CERLCA, but restoration damages must actually be used to restore the property Section 113(b) of CERCLA provides that “United States district courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies arising under this chapter. [read post]