Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 1,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm by Unknown
United States (Birthright Citizenship) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlState of Minnesota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:59 am by Greg Jacobs
By refusing to hear arguments over whether a state can limit campaign spending by corporations, the Supreme Court refused to reconsider its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Montana maintains that the state supreme court’s ruling does not conflict with Citizens United. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:36 am by Aaron Barkoff
On January 23, 2013, a group of major universities and technology transfer offices filed an amicus brief urging the United States Supreme Court to affirm the Federal Circuit in Monsanto v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:02 pm by Seth Jaffe
Cataract Creek is a tributary of the Boulder River, which in turn is a tributary of the Jefferson River—a traditionally navigable water of the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:58 am by Sue Meyer
On August 21, 2014, the United States District Court for the District of Montana remanded the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forested State Trust Lands Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and suspended the associated Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit(Permit) for incidental take of the threatened grizzly bear. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
United States and GE Energy Power Conversion France v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Peter Vickery
In fact, corporations are free to make campaign contributions so long as they solicit them from employees and shareholders, then pass them on to candidates via separate, transparent accounts, and file two simple forms with the state.When Montana’s state’s supreme court upheld the law, ATP asked the Supreme Court of the United States to stay the decision, effectively granting an injunction. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:52 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Among other arguments, they urged the Court not to consider developments in campaign finance since the Court’s 2010 ruling that is centrally at issue: Citizens United v. [read post]