Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
This law is administered by the United States Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks what standard should be used to determine what constitutes a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am by Kalvis Golde
Wayfair: the potential for “billions in new revenue” for state and local governments via sales taxes levied on online merchants like Amazon, but also complications from “businesses making mathematical errors, given the complexity of sales taxes across the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Gee “may well signal the future of abortion rights in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
United States, the Court has been again asked to interpret the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 5:22 pm by India McKinney
United States clarified that individuals maintain a Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in location data held by third parties, thus requiring a warrant for the government to collect it. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
After extradition to the U.S., they are convicted of, among other things, killing an officer or employee of the United States and using a firearm while committing a crime of violence. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
United States, involving how to determine what constitutes a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, for this blog. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Thole v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
United States and GE Energy Power Conversion France v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey and involves the extent to which federal fraud statutes cover the politically motivated acts of public officials. [read post]