Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Eleven states (Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Oklahoma and West Virginia) explicitly limit the total number of ballots an individual may deliver, notarize or authorize on behalf of voters. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 2:14 pm by Chris Castle
The United States of America, acting under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, and the States of Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, South Carolina, and Texas, acting through their respective Attorneys General, bring this action under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The respondents in the case are Muslim men who lawfully immigrated to the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the abstract: In 1981, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Montana v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:20 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Montana Eighth Judicial District (consolidated with Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:21 pm by Unknown
United States Department of the Interior (IGRA)Tule Lake Committee v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
”  Those agreements with qualified state beef councils, some private and some created by state statutes included  Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm by John Ross
He flees to the United States, where he seeks asylum on the ground that he will be tortured if returned to Syria. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:14 am by Unknown
McKee (Tribal Courts; Water Rights) United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am by James Romoser
” But, he continues, “it was by no means the final legal battle over educational choice in the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
The case “could have big implications for parties that have an interest in the development or protection of the seafloors surrounding the United States — environmentalists and industry actors alike,” Smith writes. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by Amy Howe
The cases scheduled for argument during the November session are below: United States Fish & Wildlife Service v. [read post]