Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
The Court has granted four new cases today:  PPL Montana v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:15 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:10 am by Colin Miller
 And then, there is Montana, which after the recent opinion of the Supreme Court of Montana in Hendershott v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
  PPL and the United States (which has filed a brief on the merits supporting PPL) rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 8:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
 4:45 – 5:00:  Closing Day 2: (presented with the Criminal Law Section, State of Montana) Friday, May 7, 2021 12:45 – 1:00: Opening (Lillian Alvernaz, Indian Law Section Chair; James Taylor, Criminal Law Section Chair; Sam Alpert, State Bar of Montana)  1:00 – 2:45: The Death Penalty in State & Federal Courts Panelists: Michael Donahoe, Deputy Federal Defender, Federal Defenders of… [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 7:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Dept. of Justice: Crow Allottees Cert Petition Question presented: Can the water rights owned by individual Crow Indian allottees – which this Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:47 am by Rick Hasen
Bullock in support of a ruling by the Supreme Court of Montana that upheld a state law banning corporate expenditures in Montana state elections.” [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
And those 26 states have now been joined by the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Rev. 307Tribal Jurisdiction Under The Second Montana Exception: Implications Of United States v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:07 pm by Brooke Wahlberg
On April 28, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the District of Montana’s finding that the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Herrera v Wyoming An 1868 treaty between the United States and the Crow Tribe promised that in exchange for most of the Tribe’s territory in modern-day Montana and Wyoming, its members would “have the right to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States so long as game may be found thereon . . . and peace subsists . . . on the borders of the hunting districts. [read post]