Search for: "Montana v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:47 am
Bullock in support of a ruling by the Supreme Court of Montana that upheld a state law banning corporate expenditures in Montana state elections.” [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
And those 26 states have now been joined by the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:38 am
Fletcher Note PDF United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:22 am
Rev. 307Tribal Jurisdiction Under The Second Montana Exception: Implications Of United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:31 am
In Herring v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:23 am
In January 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:07 pm
On April 28, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the District of Montana’s finding that the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am
Facts of Herrera v Wyoming An 1868 treaty between the United States and the Crow Tribe promised that in exchange for most of the Tribe’s territory in modern-day Montana and Wyoming, its members would “have the right to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States so long as game may be found thereon . . . and peace subsists . . . on the borders of the hunting districts. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm
United States, the Court has been again asked to interpret the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 10:20 am
The 9th Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued an opinion recently in Goudelock v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:42 am
” Late Friday, the Montana Supreme Court defied the Citizens United decision, holding that its state law banning corporate spending in elections is valid, setting up what could be a new challenge to the 2010 case, as we detailed here, and our own Jess Bravin reported here. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Wednesday’s oral argument in PPL Montana v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm
Back in April, this blog boldly predicted that the United States Supreme Court would exert little effort in dismissing the State of Montana’s effort to convince us that the Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am
The Court affirmed that the landowners’ state law claims were not preempted by CERLCA, but restoration damages must actually be used to restore the property Section 113(b) of CERCLA provides that “United States district courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies arising under this chapter. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
United States Bureau of Land Management, Case No. 08-178-M-DWM, in the U.S. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:51 am
The United States Supreme Court is currently reviewing a petition for a writ of certiorari in the case of American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:46 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently heard argument in Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:30 pm
Wilson, that the law was not inconsistent with the United States Supreme Court holding in Coker v. [read post]
