Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2020, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
United States, the Court has been again asked to interpret the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 10:20 am
The 9th Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued an opinion recently in Goudelock v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:34 am by Thomas Merrill
Wednesday’s oral argument in PPL Montana v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm by Stefan Passantino
  Back in April, this blog boldly predicted that the United States Supreme Court would exert little effort in dismissing the State of Montana’s effort to convince us that the Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am by Court C. VanTassell
The Court affirmed that the landowners’ state law claims were not preempted by CERLCA, but restoration damages must actually be used to restore the property Section 113(b) of CERCLA provides that “United States district courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies arising under this chapter. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:51 am by Stefan Padfield
The United States Supreme Court is currently reviewing a petition for a writ of certiorari in the case of American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:46 pm by David Miller
The United States Supreme Court recently heard argument in Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:30 pm
Wilson, that the law was not inconsistent with the United States Supreme Court holding in Coker v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm by Native American Rights Fund
McBride (Child Custody) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlQuapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  As they noted: Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
The Court--or rather the same five Justices appointed by Republicans who brought us Citizens United--held that Citizens United squarely forbids states from banning corporate spending on elections--whatever the facts in that state. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:43 pm by John C. Manoog III
Related Blog Posts United States Supreme Court Reverses Conviction in Massachusetts Stun Gun Possession Case – Caetano v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 10:39 pm by Josh Blackman
United States continues the long-standing controversy over the Constitution's distinction between "direct" and "indirect" taxes. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:30 am
Initially, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that exclusion of witnesses was too severe a remedy, 493 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir. 2007), however, on rehearing en banc in, United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am by Marissa Miller
United States, the legal challenge to Arizona immigration bill S.B. 1070. [read post]