Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2012, 1:54 pm by Rick Hasen
Among other arguments, they urged the Court not to consider developments in campaign finance since the Court’s 2010 ruling that is centrally at issue: Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Peter Vickery
In fact, corporations are free to make campaign contributions so long as they solicit them from employees and shareholders, then pass them on to candidates via separate, transparent accounts, and file two simple forms with the state.When Montana’s state’s supreme court upheld the law, ATP asked the Supreme Court of the United States to stay the decision, effectively granting an injunction. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm by Unknown
Cranford (Reserved Water Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPamela J. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 8:54 am by Bill Raftery
Constitution provides “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am by Court C. VanTassell
The Court affirmed that the landowners’ state law claims were not preempted by CERLCA, but restoration damages must actually be used to restore the property Section 113(b) of CERCLA provides that “United States district courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies arising under this chapter. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Joshua Matz
United States, in which the state has asked the Court to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision blocking enforcement of four provisions of S.B. 1070, its controversial immigration law.  [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
United States, involving how to determine what constitutes a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, for this blog. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 12:04 pm by James Hirsen
Alito pointed out the following: “Montana’s provision was modeled on the failed Blaine Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:26 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Interior (Land into Trust; Alaska Tribes)United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court will decide next term “what constitutes criminal “computer misuse” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
   The case refused to hear the states’ plea in Montana v. [read post]