Search for: "Moore v. Barge" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2017, 4:13 pm by Frederick B. Goldsmith
Moore–McCormack Lines, Inc., 386 U.S. 724, 726, 87 S.Ct. 1410, 1412, 18 L.Ed.2d 482 (1967); Poignant v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:31 am by Will Bland
  These principles were discussed in Conagra, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:17 pm by Mark Murakami
The court found that although the barge was moored, it was not moored permanently as it had moved for maintenance. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:17 pm
The court found that although the barge was moored, it was not moored permanently as it had moved for maintenance. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:24 am by Anthony B. Cavender
The injunction halted the operation of a barge mooring facility that had been authorized by the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
The Defendants' argued that Catalyst did not suffer any physical harm, and cited Reserve Mooring Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 12:37 pm by Mark Murakami
The court found that although the barge was moored, it was not moored permanently as it had moved for maintenance. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:31 am by John McFarland
The facility is essentially a mile and a half parking lot for mooring of up to 200 barges that carry oil, chemicals and hazardous cargo. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:15 am
In Port of London Authority v Ashmore [2009] EWHC 954 (Ch) the Defendant had, since 1983, tethered his sailing barge to Albion Wharf on the Thames close by Battersea Bridge. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Will Bland
Last month the First Judicial District Court of Appeal for Illinois reached its opinion in Ballard v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:26 pm by Biersdorf & Associates
On or about July 13, 2006, after the WisDOT acquired Ryan’s property at 260 North 12th Street by eminent domain, the barge partially sank into the Menomonee River and became moored on the river bed. [read post]