Search for: "Moore v. Clark" Results 1 - 20 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm by Paul Caron
Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar), What Issues Are Fair Game in Moore v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar), Moore: The Overlooked Excise Power, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 1759 (Dec. 4, 2023): Moore v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Guest Author
On December 5th, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm by Tracey Roberts
Roberts (Cumberland; Google Scholar) reviews new works by Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar), Moore: The Overlooked Excise Power, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 1759 (Dec. 4, 2023) and Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan; Google Scholar), Effects from Moore: Does the Corporate Tax Require Realization, 182 Tax Notes Fed.... [read post]
The Parr Richey team who worked on the case included Kent Frandsen, Katie Moore, Erin Borissov, and John Kinney. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:49 pm
Pate said he believed he could register Moore as the Democratic nominee with the Clark County clerk of court. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by David H. Moore
Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University] The Supreme Court’s decision in Medellin v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:58 am by GUY BLACKWOOD QC, QUADRANT CHAMBERS
Issue 4, “honest dealing” The Court analysed the principle as follows: Lord Clarke (para 46) agreed with Lord Justice Moore-Bick that the principle of “honest dealing” was not an independent principle limiting the cope of third party debt orders otherwise than by reference to recognised proprietary interests. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 7:49 am
Ben Zion Hershberg of the Louisville Courier Journal reports on the Court of Appeals decision yesterday in the case of Mike Perry, City of Charleston Sewer Dept. v. [read post]