Search for: "Moore v. Cole" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 3:06 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Yetkin v London Borough of Newham [2010] EWCA Civ 776 (13 July 2010) Badger Trust v The Welsh Ministers [2010] EWCA Civ 807 (13 July 2010) Ghadami & Anor v Lyon Cole Insurance Group Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 767 (13 July 2010) FlooHorridge (t/a Newford Parts Centre) v Downshire House (Reproductions) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 777 (13 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Willett & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
(EDKy) & Gilman, J; Moore, J., concurring in the judgment) (18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
Cole, it may mark the fulfillment of a constitutional vision Justice Ginsburg expressed more than 30 years ago. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:54 am by Howard Bashman
” And at the “Election Law Blog,” Derek Muller has a post titled “‘Final judgment,’ not mootness, at issue in latest Moore v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm by Josh Blackman
By my count, only three active judges from Grutter remain: Moore, Cole, and Clay. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 12:48 pm
  Judges Cole, Martin, Daughtrey, Moore, Clay, Gilman, Gibbons, and White voted to reverse. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 6:21 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Moore wrote the dissent, joined by Judges Merritt, Cole, Clay, White, Stranch and Donald. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Moore wrote the opinion for the court, joined by Judge Cole. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:39 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Moore concurred in the judgment only, joined by Cole and Clay, as did Judge White. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 5:09 am
In December, the Sixth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 8:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Jane Stranch dissented, joined by Judges Cole, Moore, and Donald, arguing that existing Sixth Amendment jurisprudence allows for a more fact-specific analysis and the conclustion that the defendant's right to counsel did attach pre-indictment, at least in this case. [read post]