Search for: "Moore v. New York" Results 101 - 120 of 636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 7:51 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Peck in the Southern District of New York case becomes commonplace.The good news: A number of lawyers could be freed from the drudgery of document review if the predictive coding protocol becomes a trend.Designed to allow documents obtained through electronic discovery to be categorized without having a set of human eyes review each page, predictive coding is expected to be used in Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 12:55 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Rights Officer Had Probable Cause to Arrest Plaintiff But Strip Search in Public Not Reasonable Moore v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:24 am
Being a reader of the Amsterdam Daily News, which describes itself as "one of New York's largest and most influential Black-owned and operated business institutions" and which has a circulation of about 25,000, is a legitimate ground for exercising a peremptory challenge against an African-American jury panel member, the Second Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:41 am
United States, Second Circuit.pdf: The Eastern District of New York denied Appellants' petition for writ of error coram nobis. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 6:28 am by Amy Howe
” At the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog, Patricia Moore responds to a post by Wen Fa at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog (which in turn responds to a column by Linda Greenhouse in The New York Times) on Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Supp. 2d 522, 530 (N.D.N.Y. 2006) (“the fact that the subject of the allegedly defamatory online postings is located in New York does not support New York jurisdiction”). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:09 am by Eric Penzer
  It explained that New York’s “marriage recognition rule affords comity to out-of-state marriages and ‘recognizes as valid a marriage considered valid in the place where celebrated’” (id., quoting Van Voorhis v Brintnall, 86 NY 18, 25 [1881]). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:17 am
The appeal was taken from a controversial Southern District of New York decision, which held that isolated DNA is not patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:45 pm by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court's order earlier today refusing to stay a federal district court order in Strange v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
For this last week: Moore v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:59 am by Michelle O'Neil
I read with interest last week’s post from lawyer Daniel Clement of the New York Divorce Report about a New York case holding a premarital agreement valid even after the couple tore it up on their honeymoon. [read post]