Search for: "Moore v. Proper" Results 301 - 320 of 577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
District Court for the Northern District of New York, Moore v Dreyer and Curley, 05-CV-1060 and Cornick v City of Saratoga Springs, Curley and Dreyer, 06-CV-0138. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
In Sulamérica Cia Nacional De Seguros S.A. v Enesa Engenharia S.A. [2012] EWCA Civ 638, the insurance contract in question concerned a project in Brazil, was governed by Brazilian law, and disputes arising out of or in connection with the policy were subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Brazilian courts. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:54 am
Second, he agrees with Moore-Bick LJ that the reasoning in C v D is not the foundation of the Court's decision here; in fact, he thinks a "powerful case" may be made against the reasoning in C v D. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:23 am by Steve Hall
"There are many cases where people are struggling and they don't have DNA, but they now have hope," Allen's attorney, Kris Moore of McKinney, Texas, told The Times. [read post]
9 May 2012, 2:51 am by Legal Beagle
In April 1812, as Bellingham pursued his campaign in London, a civil servant told him he was at liberty to take whatever measures he thought proper. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:58 am by Matthew Nelson
While the gaze of the eDiscovery community has been firmly transfixed on the unfolding drama in the Da Silva Moore, et. al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am by 1 Crown Office Row
In a unanimous decision ([2012] UKSC 11) the Supreme Court allowed the appeal of  Times Newspapers Limited against a decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) which had held that it could not rely on Reynolds qualified privilege. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC
In a unanimous decision ([2012] UKSC 11) the Supreme Court today allowed the appeal of Times Newspapers Ltd against a decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) which had held that held that it could not rely on Reynolds qualified privilege. [read post]