Search for: "Moore v. Proper" Results 421 - 440 of 577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm by Gene Quinn
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:59 pm by Patrick Lin
Related to my work here in robot ethics, the following is an advance look at my paper forthcoming in Journal of Military Ethics: Military 2.0: Ethical Blowback from Emerging Technologies ABSTRACT: The military is a major driver of technological, world-changing innovations which, like the Internet, often have unpredictable dual uses and widespread civilian impact (‘blowback’). [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by SHG
Moore, 612 F.3d 698, 703 (D.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 7:06 am by Marin
“Every thief  has an excuse,” Jacob Moore, Gekko’s protégé in Wall Street 2, and if Diandra squandered her settlement money or invested it with the wrong people, she had nobody to blame but herself.Or her old lawyer. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am by Andrew Dickinson
Here, a number of very interesting questions arise (apart from those identified above concerning the proper interpretation of Art. 4): Did Mr Jacobs’ claim against the MIB constitute a “civil and commercial” matter within Art. 1(1) of the Rome II Regulation? [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  The press release is here and there is a post about the report on Martin Moore’s blog. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
As such, no issue of conflict of laws arose, and Rome II was not relevant.Lord Justice Moore-Bick, delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal, held that on the proper construction of Regulation 13, any compensation payable by the MIB was to be assessed according to English, not Spanish law. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm by James Bickford
Moore’s arguments Moore argues that, although Strickland, Hill, and a third case – Kimmelman v. [read post]