Search for: "Moore v. Proper" Results 61 - 80 of 450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2019, 11:59 am by Guest
That ruling was a mistake: whether or not requiring a purchase of health insurance was itself a commerce regulation, it was plainly necessary and proper to a regulation of interstate commerce in health care, and therefore a legitimate implied power under McCulloch v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 1:56 pm by Scott McKeown
Amicus Briefing May Help Get SCOTUS Attention on Growing 101 Morass In one of the more closely-watched cases involving patent eligibility, American Axle v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:14 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued July 28, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Rivers v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:20 pm
The case, Greenbrier Obstetrics and Gynecology v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by James Bickford
Instead, the Court emphasized, the proper test is found in Hill v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
Moore-Bick LJ again considered the speech by Lord Brandon in Livesey. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:38 am
Moore, 128 S.Ct. 1598 (2008) have precluded that argument, and that the litmus test is reasonableness under the Constitution.U.S. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm by James Bickford
Moore’s arguments Moore argues that, although Strickland, Hill, and a third case – Kimmelman v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
” It is not a given that any further proceedings would be “proper,” given the court’s definitive ruling, albeit on a threshold question about the preliminary injunction. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
ISBN 9780199568659).David V Williams, University of AucklandKirkby, Diane (ed). [read post]