Search for: "Moore v. Regents of University of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2008, 6:40 pm
Regents of the University of California. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm
Regents of the University of California, 167-177 Notes, 177-178 [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 12:44 pm
Recent law, however, has sided with pharmaceutical companies by stating that tissues removed through a medical procedure can, in fact, be used for "medical research" or commercial purposes without the consent of their donor (Moore v. the Regents of the University of California). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm
In 1990, the California Supreme Court basically decided in Moore v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm
In 1990, the California Supreme Court basically decided in Moore v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:32 am
Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal. 3d 120 (Cal. 1990) The Boyds from Boyd v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am
Regents of Univ. of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990) (property interest in one’s genetic material)15. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Moor v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
Regents of the University of California, 271 Cal. [read post]
9 May 2008, 3:08 pm
Regents of the University of California 81% The Peevyhouses, of Peevyhouse v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
As we reported yesterday, the California Supreme Court denied the petitions for review in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:55 pm
Regents of University of California, 793 P.2d 479, 51 Cal.3d 120 (1990). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
App. 2002)] (ruling that statements at issue in newspaper article relating to software manufacturer’s copyright infringement action against local retailer addressed public concern of software privacy, and therefore retailer was required, despite being a private figure plaintiff, to prove in defamation action that publisher acted with actual malice, i.e., that it acted with actual knowledge of falsity, or with reckless disregard as to the truth or falsity, of the story); Nadel v… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Regents of the University of Michigan, et al. (6th Cir., Case Nos. 08-1387/1389/1534 & 09-1111, Nov. 15, 2012) (PDF). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am
Regents of the University of California, a challenge to the government’s decision to terminate the DACA program, will “be important in defining the court’s relationship to a president who behaves as if he has the Supreme Court in his pocket,” because “[it] will indicate whether the Roberts court — more specifically, the chief justice himself — will continue to insist on believable explanations from an administration that often… [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:35 am
The case is Olson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm
This case reminds me of the landmark case of Moore v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
Regents of the University of California, the famous 1993 California Supreme Court ruling that a person has no property right in his excised spleen. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587, Trump v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Since declaring affirmative action in admissions to be unconstitutional in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
