Search for: "Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2023, 7:07 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed based on the Court’s decision in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:25 am by Lindsay Colvin Stone
Prior to Groff, courts evaluated whether a requested accommodation imposed an “undue burden” under the test set by the Supreme Court in the 1977 case Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:30 pm by vcadmin
Based on a Supreme Court decision issued almost 50 years ago, Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:01 am by DONALD SCARINCI
’” However, the Third Circuit further found that Groff’s proposed accommodation of being exempted from Sunday work would cause an undue hardship under Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 7:40 am by Kevin J. White and Scott W. Burton
The de minimis test was first set forth by the Supreme Court in Trans World Airlines, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:24 pm by Kalvis Golde
Five years later, the court stated in Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
The second issue, however, may entice enough members of the Supreme Court to revisit its 1977 decision in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 378-79 (1992), because the Connecticut statute does not “relate[] to rates, routes or services [of airlines],” Memorandum of Decision, p. 43; and (3) the Airport and Airway Improvement Act, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:39 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 378-79 (1992), because the Connecticut statute does not “relate[] to rates, routes or services [of airlines],” Memorandum of Decision, p. 43; and (3) the Airport and Airway Improvement Act, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]