Search for: "Moreland v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 10:24 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:10 am
Today, I reaffirm my commitment to clean up Albany and state clearly that either ethics legislation will be passed or I will form a Moreland Commission by the end of this legislative session. [read post]
14 May 2008, 5:40 am
In State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:30 am
The case of Samuda v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 9:24 am
Pennsylvania State Law Enforcement, 2023 WL 3767745 (E.D. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:04 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
“Retired Oregon State University professor of history William G. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Simson, The Uncertain Good of Overruling Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 12:32 am
Moreland, 509 F.3d 1201, 1223 (9th Cir.2007), United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:21 am
Wallace dissented, arguing that the state's application of harmlessness was reasonable.U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
Moreland, John H. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:18 am
Moreland, No. 05-30541 (Hug with McKeown and W. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Moreland-Lyon, 2012 WL 5384558, at *3 (D.Kan. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:05 am
Oman, John Calvin’s Quarrel with Civil Recourse Theory, (Christianity and Private Law, Robert Cochran & Michael Moreland, eds. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
Moreland-Lyon, 2012 WL 5384558, at *2 (D. [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:35 am
Moreland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
"[F]ederal constitutional claims may not be asserted in the Court of Claims, given that the statutory basis for such claims, 42 USC § 1983, authorizes claims only against a 'person' and defendant is not a person within the meaning of this statute" (Oppenheimer v State of New York, 152 AD3d 1006, 1008 [2017]; accord Moreland v State of New York, 200 AD3d 1362, 1365 [2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 906 [2022]; see Will v Michigan… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
"[F]ederal constitutional claims may not be asserted in the Court of Claims, given that the statutory basis for such claims, 42 USC § 1983, authorizes claims only against a 'person' and defendant is not a person within the meaning of this statute" (Oppenheimer v State of New York, 152 AD3d 1006, 1008 [2017]; accord Moreland v State of New York, 200 AD3d 1362, 1365 [2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 906 [2022]; see Will v Michigan… [read post]