Search for: "Morgan County v. May" Results 1 - 20 of 446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division  could not supply… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division  could not supply… [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
Morgan, 315 N.C. 626, 634, 340 S.E.2d 84, 89 (1986); State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Later, the documents appeared to have been removed from the court’s public docket, suggesting it may have been posted inadvertently. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Prospect Capital Corp. v Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 33797(U)October 25, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 653941/2022 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Kate Huddleston
In May 2021, Kinney County Sheriff Brad Coe publicly discussed working with County Attorney Brent Smith “to start prosecuting these people that are trespassing on y’all’s property. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
… An example of … [this] category is supplied by the facts of [Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 1239 (HL)]; reference in the article to a “dog-doping gang” which the claimant contended would be understood to refer to him by readers with knowledge of extrinsic facts. 22. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 10:59 am by Giles Peaker
A demand for £616 made in May 2014 should not have been awarded by the FTT because the Management Company had not issued proceedings in the county court for that sum until 2021. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:28 am by Alex Phipps
In this Moore County case, the Supreme Court per curiam affirmed and modified State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm by Shea Denning
As I previously mentioned, Justice Earls (joined by Justice Morgan) dissented. [read post]