Search for: "Morgan v. Louisiana" Results 21 - 40 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While they were not at direct issue in Smith, the power to quarantine ships was upheld against commerce clause and foreign affairs challenges in Morgan's Steamship Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:55 pm
FEC, 07-320), and on federal regulators' power to undo wholesale energy sales contracts (Morgan Stanley Capital v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
FEC, 07-320), and on federal regulators’ power to undo wholesale energy sales contracts (Morgan Stanley Capital v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:48 pm
   Much as with Plessy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:58 am by Steven Boutwell
” Judge Morgan reviewed each of these cases in formulating her well-reasoned opinion in Thibodaux v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:58 am by Steven Boutwell
” Judge Morgan reviewed each of these cases in formulating her well-reasoned opinion in Thibodaux v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also granted defendants’ request to modify a protective order barring them from inquiring into the immigration status of the plaintiffs, guestworkers from India who allege they were brought to the U.S. to work on a temporary basis under false pretenses (David v Signal International, LLC, August 13, 2014, David v Signal International, LLC, August 12, 2014, Morgan, S). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
BP p.l.c.Case number: 12-cv-2774 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana)Case filed: November 15, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: December 10, 2012 1/4/2013 4/4/2013 2013-8 SEC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:55 pm by Steven Boutwell
Judge Morgan reaffirmed her position four days later in an identical opinion in Lee v. [read post]