Search for: "Morgan v. Social Security Administration Commissioner" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
JP Morgan Chase Bank    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0285p.06 2008/08/11 Timothy Landis v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the petitioner that… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Rosalind English
The following summary is taken from the Supreme Court site’s Press Release, with my comment below: This appeal concerns the question whether, in cases of social security benefit awards mistakenly inflated due to a calculation error, the Secretary of State is entitled to recover sums overpaid under the common law of unjust enrichment or whether section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (the “1992 Act”) provides the only… [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 2 July 2019 Soole J handed down judgment in Morgan v Times Newspapers Ltd, heard 13 May 2019 ([2019] EWHC 1525 (QB)) There was an article about the case in the Law Society Gazette. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has recommended organisations utilise privacy enhancing technologies “to share people’s personal information safely, securely and anonymously. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Morgan Trowland and Marcus Decker challenged the “extraordinary length” of their sentences, arguing they were unprecedented and disproportionate for non-violent protest. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The most striking legal story of the week was the reporting of the Administrative Court’s ruling on Article 50 and the Royal Prerogative ([2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)). [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Government has announced that legislation to place age restrictions on online pornography which was due to come into effect on 15 July 2019 now be delayed for up to 6 months after an administrative error. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
There is a review of the new book, “Untold: the Daniel Morgan Murder Exposed” by Peter Jukes and Alastair Morgan on the Press Gang blog. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 01221-20 Morgan v Monmouthshire Beacon, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 00067-20 Pearson v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
As noted below, the Administrative Court will hear the appeal in the case of R (Chambers) v DPP on Wednesday. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Landmark Supreme Court Fight Over Social Media Now Looks Likely MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 9/19/2022 Conflicting lower court rulings about removing controversial material from social media platforms point toward a landmark U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media On 21 January 2020, the Information Commissioner’s Office has published its final Age Appropriate Design Code, a set of 15 standards that online services should meet to protect children’s privacy. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
House Democrats File Lawsuit to Enforce Subpoena Against McGahn The Hill – Olivia Beavers, Jacqueline Thomsen, and Morgan Chalfant | Published: 8/7/2019 House Judiciary Committee Chairperson Jerrold Nadler filed a civil lawsuit to enforce a subpoena for testimony from Don McGahn, the former White House counsel who at the Trump administration’s direction defied lawmakers’ request to appear before the committee. [read post]