Search for: "Morgan v. State Board of Equalization" Results 21 - 40 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 8:30 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
It was sufficient, according to the court, that there is “credible evidence that shareholders could reasonably conclude that the perceived benefits equal or outweigh the costs. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Earlier this week, in a written statement to the House of Commons, the UK’s Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, the Rt Hon Nicky Morgan MP, announced the end of the UK’s controversial age-verification plans for online porn Part 3 of the Digital Economy Act 2017 ((hereafter: DEA), as given further effect by the Online Pornography (Commercial Basis) Regulations 2019 (SI No 23 of 2019)) seeks to regulate online… [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am by Ronald Collins
Morgan Hill Unified School District); A commercial speech tour-guide licensing case (Kagan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Board of Education (1954) carried the day, or do you think Raoul Berger had the better argument in his book, “Government by Judiciary” (1977), in which he argued that Bickel’s historical defense was untenable? [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, heard 22 and 23 July 2014. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm by Ken
So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Aetna Life Insurance, Emprise, Inc., Texas State Medical Board, and the United States Government, and was found not guilty in all 5 cases, you will wish you never wrote your article. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
Cohen, Senior Counsel, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, previously served on the Board from 1994-1996 as one of President Clinton’s nominees. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am by Alfred Brophy
Board of Education: the idea is that the Supreme Court supported Brown because it served the United States’ cold war agenda of supporting human rights. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
§ 1983, and for malicious prosecution, defamation, and tortious interference with a prospective contract, pursuant to Ohio state law. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 18-260, and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:10 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Nortel is Now Final: Most Software is Now Exempt from California Sales Tax; State Board of Equalization Expected To Fight Refund Claims[By: Reed Smith |In: Intellectual Property]5. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
So far, the decisions have validated the party’s state-by-state legal strategy and offered a reprieve from several Republican gerrymandering attempts before a single election could be held under the new lines. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Yee, First District Board Member, California State Board of Equalization who worked diligently with Congress and urging support and passage of this legislation. [read post]