Search for: "Morgan v. Wells"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Such a centralized voting and engagement model may serve some funds well, but run roughshod over other funds’ objectives. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
This idea appears to be working well, although the SEC has made relatively few awards. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
I would like to thank Ed Morgan (Toronto, ON Canada) who, at the time when my previous comment was posted, brought to my attention the text of the Ontario judgment whose enforcement was sought in Dubai in the present case. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm
Estate of Finley v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
She confirmed her identity as the woman portrayed in the series in a recent interview with Piers Morgan. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account approval… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division could not supply the… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division could not supply the… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am
Understanding how Redbubble still legally functions despite the copyright violations of its users requires an understanding of copyright law’s place on the Internet, as well as two key cases: Atari Interactive, Inc., v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:16 am
From Judge William Alsup's Tentative Order filed Tuesday in Doe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Courtesy of Morgan Freeman. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
1981 – Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom In 1967, homosexuality was in part decriminalised in England and Wales.[2] In 1980, it would be decriminalised under the same conditions in Scotland, and in 1982, in Northern Ireland as well. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
In Morgan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
Here, in the Reif v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Morgan Slip op. at 15 (internal citation omitted). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
