Search for: "Morgan v. Wells" Results 181 - 200 of 1,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2017, 8:03 am by MBettman
This case will be argued at Morgan High School in Morgan County as part of the court’s off-site program. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 7:32 am by Steven Eversole
Additional Resources: Morgan Co. machete face-off leads to arrest, July 21, 2015, WSFA 12 More Blog Entries: Marks v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm by Valerie Oosterveld
She cited some cases about corporate responsibility in war crimes, such as Khulumani (United States), Sanader (Croatia), Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
Palestinian Authority – as well as last week’s cert. grant in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:40 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Hunt County, 2019 WL 1594319 (5th Cir Apr. 15, 2019) Related posts: President Trump Violated the First Amendment by Blocking Users @realdonaldtrump Kentucky Governor Can Block Constituents on Social Media–Morgan v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Morgan, The History and Economics of Suretyship, 12 Cornell L.Q. 153 (1927))). [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division  could not supply the… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division  could not supply the… [read post]