Search for: "Morillion v. Royal Packing Co. (2000)" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2011, 5:15 am by Andrew Frisch
Co., 721 F.Supp.2d 804, 820 (N.D.Ill.2010) (time rounding and log-out policies may violate FLSA if they “cause[ ] plaintiffs to work unpaid overtime”); Austin v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:58 am
Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal.4th 575, 578 (2000), held that Rutti was entitled to seek compensation because he was subject to his employer’s control during his commute because he was foreclosed from engaging in personal pursuits that he would otherwise have been able to undertake if he was permitted to travel to the field using his own transportation. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 1:32 am
 The court also noted that it is not required to follow the DLSE opinion on the matter, citing Murphy v. [read post]